Our Answering Brief to TJ's Opening Brief

We filed our Reply to Trader Joe's 9th Circuit Appeal of the District Court's Dismissal

Here's a highlight from our 55 pages of solid factual argument (Ace Counsel: Dorsey & Whitney, Seattle):

"Due to Trader Joe’s inability to bring an action against Hallatt under Canadian trademark law, Trader Joe’s seeks to use U.S. trademark law and U.S. courts to police Hallatt’s acts occurring in Canadian commerce.

This directly conflicts with Canadian law, as the rights which Trader Joe’s seeks to enforce in this action are rights, which Trader Joe’s does not possess under Canadian law."

Mike Hallatt